Opinion: Concept of ‘sanctuary city’ adds to mounting immigration issues

From The Echo:

By failing to comply with federal law regarding sanctuary cities, Minneapolis and St. Paul, along with other cities, are threats to the concept of the 11th amendment — that federal law is the supreme law of the land.

States must follow federal law, particularly the executive order issued by President Donald Trump. The law states, “sanctuary jurisdictions across the United States willfully violate federal law in an attempt to shield aliens from removal from the United States.” Essentially, sanctuary cities violate federal law and so whether states believe the law is morally right or not is not a question.

There isn’t an official federal sanctuary city. It is more of an idea, a model of how to govern. Currently in the Twin Cities, there are rules that officials must give assistance before they ask about immigration status. Both Twin Cities’ mayors have said publically that everyone is welcome here, and legal status does not matter.

The president has threatened to withhold funding from cities who refuse to comply with immigration laws, which further complicates the issue of illegal immigration. The federal government cannot coerce Minneapolis and Saint Paul to comply, but Minneapolis and Saint Paul must comply with federal law. If states begin to ignore federal law, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has the right to come after the states and force compliance.

States must follow federal law, and people cannot be in the country without proper documentation. When state or federal employees know of someone’s improper documentation — illegal status — they should be mandated to report to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Being an American citizen, living in America and reaping the benefits is not a right, it is a privilege — one that many don’t want to acknowledge.

According to Pew Research Center in Minnesota there are an estimated 100,000 illegal immigrants. This costs Minnesota taxpayers $717 million according to Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). The United States simply cannot afford to ignore illegal immigrants, which makes Presidents Trumps threats understandable.

However, the line between coercion and enforcement is incredibly blurry when it comes to sanctuary cities. The federal government must recognize this fine line, and only ask that state and federal employees become mandatory reporters to ICE, instead of doing ICE’s job.


2 thoughts on “Opinion: Concept of ‘sanctuary city’ adds to mounting immigration issues

Add yours

  1. Excellent blog! Do you have any recommendations for aspiring writers? I’m hoping to start my own website soon but I’m a little lost on everything. Would you advise starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m completely confused .. Any suggestions? Thanks a lot!


    1. Thank you! I am going through a redesign with it, so it is in rough shape. My advice is to just do it. I spent so much time debating yes or no and once I just finally made the site and started working on it I learned my way around. I am learning more, hence the redesign. I would recommend WordPress, because as you get more into it, and more comfortable you can pay for more professional upgrades. It’s the best platform out there in my opinion.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: